|
INTRODUCTION
THE POST-MAHENDRA PAL ERA
ASKOTE AND THE PAL FAMILY
REMNANTS OF OLD CULTURE
FINAL REMARKS
GENEALOGY OF THE
PAL FAMILY
INTRODUCTION
On the northern fringe of the present day Uttar Pradesh
province of India, at the Indo-Nepal, Indo-Tibetan border,
there was a small state called Askote. This state had been
created and owned by a splintered branch of Katyuri kings
in the 13th century A.D. A well-written history of the Katyuri
kings and their empire is not available. However, in 1875,
E.T. Atkinson was appointed by the British government to prepare
a detailed district-wise report on the then northwestern province
of British India. According to him the Katyuri Empire once
extended in the east from Bhagalpur, district Bihar (in India)
to Kabul (in Afghanistan) in the west. According to a legend
prevalent in the Pal family of Askote and as recorded by Atkinson,
one Shaliwahan Dev had gone to the Himalayas from Ayodhya
and settled in Joshimath, near Badrinath (Garhwal). One of
his descendants, Basu Dev, once went out for hunting and upon
returning to his residence found a man sleeping in his bed.
Enraged by his insolence, regional wars and revolutions, which
led to destruction and burning of villages houses and old
documents. Atkinson personally met with Pushkar Pal, Rajwar
of Askote in 1871, who gave him details about his dynasty
and the family history, including the genealogy. Based upon
this information and some available copper plate inscriptions,
Atkinson wrote about the Askote family in the Himalayan Gazetteer.
The
Katyuri Dynasty was at its zenith around the sixth and seventh
century A.D. Thereafter came a phase of decline, probably
owing to bitter family disputes and lack of coordination and
leadership. In
1279 A.D., Abhay Pal Deo, son of Trilok Pal Deo and grandson
of Emperor Brahm Deo, broke off from the family and migrated
to a peaceful but remote secluded area near what is now known
as Askote. This area was covered by a thick forest and sparsely
populated.
Having
thus abandoned his family mainstream, Abhay Pal Deo decided
to delete the surname Deo. Ever since, all of his descendants
adopted Pal as their surname. In due course the Pal family
rehabilitated itself as a modest kingdom and established a
total of eighty (Assi) small forts (Kote), and assigned the
name Assikote or Askote, as it is known today.
The
period from 1279 A.D. has no record or references in the Pal
history. This was a difficult period for the Pals, who were
persevering to regain their strength and importance in a rough
and inhospitable area by defeating the Ban Rawats (aborigine
tribes) and subjugating small khas community settlements.
During
these years they managed to develop a state of their own but
no name was assigned to it. The capital of this unnamed state
was at a place called Lakhanpur. The
exact location of Lakhanpur is debatable. According to Cunningham
(a writer), it was o the bank of the Ramganga River. Others
suggest Johar and Palipachaon as the possible location. Badridatt
Pandey mentioned Lakhanpur very briefly in his book.
I
believe that the old capital of the Pal family could not have
been remote from Askote, the place where the Pals have since
settled and lived. In fact, only about four kilometers to
the east of Askote is a place called Lakhanpur. On its east
is a steep and awesome rock called Lakhanpur ka kantha, about
one kilometer in length and touching the Kali River. A flat
plateau on the top of this rock could have been the most appropriate
place to feel safe and secure from any impending enemy attacks
during those uncertain and unsettled times.
It
was here that the Pal family settled during the 14th or 15th
century A.D. Today it is abandoned and uninhabited, quite
unsuitable for modern-day living standards. A narrow footpath
used to lead from the top of this rock to the bank of the
Kali River. A motor road now passes through this rock, leading
all the way to Kalapani near the Tibetan border.
About
a kilometer south of Lakhanpur and adjacent to a river is
the village called Bagrihat, where the Pal Rajas had their
courts and a local market. Bagar in the local dialect implies
"riverside" and hat is a "temporary market."
An old family building in Bagrihat with farmland still houses
some members of the Pal family. Atkinson
documented in his Himalayan Gazetteer that in 1581 Askote
fell under the sovereignty of the Raja Rudra Chandra of Almora,
a nearby principality. Pursottam Pant, an officer of this
Raja, conquered the Rajas of Sor, Sera and Askote.
In
1588, Rajway Rai Pal of Lakhanpur was murdered owing to his
involvement with a woman. It is said that while hunting, Raja
Rai Pal got thirsty and approached a water spring, where he
saw a woman bathing at a secluded spot. Under the circumstances
he could not resist the temptation ad handled the woman in
an inappropriate manner. The woman happened to be the wife
of Gopi Ojna, a Brahmi. This event caused Gopi Ojna to be
highly upset and incensed and he went to the court of Raja
Rudra Chanda, whose jurisdiction prevailed over the Raja of
Askote. Without providing any details of the incident, Gopi
Ojna asked the Raja in a symbolic way as to what should be
done if a Pipal tree (ficus religiosa) becomes diseased. Hindus
consider the papal as a very holy tree, which should not be
cut or damaged. Likewise, Brahmins and Hindu Rajas are considered
to be sanctuary figures, which can not be harmed. Without
knowing the real context of the question, Raja Rudra Chand
ordered that the Pipal tree be cut down. Taking this as an
order from his Raja, Gopi Ojna returned home and, with the
help of others, attacked and brutally massacred Raja Rai Pal
and his family.
The
only family survivor was a newborn child, Mahendra Pal, who
was saved by his wet nurse of the Giyal family. The nurse
hid the child under her skirt and posed as a menstruating
woman who could not be touched. As soon as the murders left
the premises, the nurse took the surviving Pal child to her
house.
Later,
Mahendra Pal was sent to the court of Raja Rudra Chand of
Almora to be brought up in security and in a proper way befitting
a prince. When the Pal child grew up, the Raja of Almora restored
the Pal state to him for an annual royalty of Rupees 400.
Mahendra
Pal returned to his state sometime in the early part of the
17th century. Rather than settling at Lakhanpur, which was
destroyed and deserted, he temporarily sojourned at a place
called Bhajbethal, which is very close to the present-day
Askote. Later he built a strong fort-like house on a small
cliff at Naring Dewal, currently known as Dewal. A temple
adjacent to Dewal houses some ancient and unique deities of
the area, carved in stone. That old and ancient house stands
erect even today and it has been the birth place of all ancestors
of today's Pal families that have settled outside Askote in
India or even overseas. This house was built primarily for
security reasons, probably after the lesson learnt from the
Lakhanpur massacre. It is a very strong stone house with low,
narrow doors and windows, especially designed to keep any
intruding army at bay. There are several areas within the
building to hide in the event of emergency. The current Rajwar
lives in an adjoining newer building.
Rajwar
Mahendra Pal did not forget the services of the wet nurse
of the Giyal family for her incredible valor and clever efforts
in saving his life. She received some land with a house adjacent
to the Rajwar's house in Askote, as a token of gratitude from
the Pal family. This house stayed with the descendants of
the Giyal family for several generations. Recently the house
was demolished and the land sold to others.
THE
POST-MAHENDRA PAL ERA
No
details are available for five generations after Raja Mahendra
Pal except the names of his successors mentioned in the genealogy.
The fifth generation after Raja Mahendra Pal was Uchhab Pal,
who became Rajwar in 1742 A.D. The genealogical table, given
to me by the present Rajwar Tikendra Bahadur Pal, indicates
that Rajwar Uchhab Pal had three wives. The eldest wife had
one son, the second wife had two, and the third had three.
Only the name of the eldest son, Bijay Pal, is known. However,
it is mentioned that the two sons of the second wife were
helped by the Gorkha and British to claim one-third of the
entire state as their share and they separated.
Atkinson
writes in Himalayan Gazetteer about a land dispute between
Rajwar Mahendra Pal and his uncle Rudra Pal during the Gorkha
rule (1790-1815). It also states that Rudra Pal and his younger
brother had their share of land separated and given to them.
Rudra Pal left Askote and settled in the village of Pungraon.
Atkinson further elaborated on the family dispute by stating
that in 1832 there was a land settlement. Eighty villages,
including Dewal, were entered in the name of Rajwar Mahendra
Pal; the remaining 24 villages, which included Helpia village,
went to the three sons of Rudra Pal: Mokam Singh, Prithwi
Singh and Sarbjit Singh. Their descendants subsequently moved
to the villages of Muani and Rawalkhet, where they still live.
According
to Atkinson, Mokham Singh and his brother had incurred heavy
debts on their 24 villages, which were auctioned and purchased
by Krishna Sah. When the new owner went to collect revenue
from the villages he was murdered. The total revenue from
these villages amounted to Rupees 364, out of which Rupees
237 had to be paid as royalty to the British rulers.
These
24 villages were then auctioned once again, being purchased
this time by Tula Ram Sah, a Khajanchi (treasurer) of Almora.
The villages were not profitable and were sold in 1855 to
Pushkar Pal, the eldest son of Rajwar Bahadur Pal. Thus these
villages once again became a part of Askote state.
Upon
Rajwar Bahadur Pal's death in 1871, Pushkar Pal became the
new Rajwar. At the land settlement of 1881, Askote state consisted
of 126 villages, of which 107 were in Talla (lower) Askote
and the remaining 19 in Malla (upper) Askote. When the Pal
family ancestors settled in this area inn the 13th century,
it was very thinly populated. They encouraged their followers
and others to clear and cultivate the land and settle there.
The increase in population was rather slow until the 19th
century.
The
Pal rulers did not conquer or occupy any well-established
and developed state or country; rather, they created one of
their own the hard way. In 1881 the population of Askote was
5879, of which 3139 were males and 2740 were females.
After
1869, when the 24 separated villages were repossessed within
Askote state, the British rulers issued a notification called
the Oudh Estates Act. This act was based on the law of primogeniture.
In accordance with this act the first-born son had the right
to inherit the entire property. The eldest son was obliged,
however, to make proper and adequate provision for the livelihood
and maintenance of all the remaining members of the family.
The Rajwas used to allot land and villages to the other members
of the family for their maintenance. In 1881, the total land
revenue of Askote state was Rupees 1250. Revenues generated
by Askote in 1994 amounted to several lakhs of Rupees (one
lakh is one tenth of a million).
Atkinson's
Himalayan Gazetteer reports that the younger princes of Katyur
Dynasty were called Rajwar. A land grant document given out
by Indra Dev Rajwar in 1202 A.D. was found in the valley of
Ajatyur. Perhaps at that time it was customary to address
princes as Rajyabar, implying "honorable prince"
in Hindi, just as another Hindi word, Manyabar, was often
used to address important people. Rajyabar later became abbreviated
to Rajwar in the local Askote dialect.
The
available genealogical tree of the Pal family only records
the names of the eldest son or successor until Uchhab Pal.
Although he had six sons, only the name of his eldest son,
Bijay Pal, is documented. However, Atkinson's Himalayan Gazetteer
reveals the name of another son, Rudra Pal, who fought his
nephew Mahendra Pal for a share of the land. The names and
fate of the remaining brothers are unknown.
Rajwar
Bijay Pall's only son, Mahendra Pal, who succeeded his father
as Rajwar, had five sons: Bahadur Singh, Cheem Singh, Tej
Singh, Lakshman Singh and Himmat Singh. Cheem Singh lived
in Askote at a place called Badghar. The remaining sons moved
to the villages of Bagrihart and Bhelia, where their descendants
continue to live.
Pushkar
Pal became the new Rajwar when his father died in 1871. His
only son, Gajendra Pal, had six sons: Bhupendra Singh, Bikram
Bahadur, Jung Bahadur, Mandhata Singh, Ram Bahadur and Jeet
Bahadur Pal. The eldest son, Bhupendra Pal, had no heir and
died in 1924, while his father was still alive.
After
Gajendra Pal's death in 1929 his second son, Bikram Bahadur
Pal, became the Rajwar of Askote. He, in turn, had three sons:
Tikendra Bahadur, Hariraj Singh and Chitravan Singh Pal. All
three sons were still minors when Rajwar Bikram Bahadur Pal
died in 1939. Therefore, the Government of United Provinces
(Uttar Pradesh) placed the state under the management of a
court of wards and sent the three sons and the rest of the
family to Almora. The boys were educated I Almora, Nainital
and Lucknow.
After
the Second World War the British rule ended and India became
an independent country on August 15, 1947. Five years later
the Uttar Pradesh Government recognized the eldest son, Tikendra
Bahadur Pal, and Askote state was handed over to him. However,
independent India started to abolish all the big and small
princely states within India. In accordance with the Uttar
Pradesh Zamindari Act and subsequently in 1964 the Kumaon
Zamindari Abolition Act, the separate entity of Askote state
came to an end. All the villages and most of the land became
a part of Didihat subdivision of District Pithoragarh.
ASKOTE
AND THE PAL FAMILY
There
are not many Khshatriya (Rajput) dynasties in India that can
claim as long a genealogy as that of the Pal family of Askote.
This fact has been recognized for hundreds of years and that
is why the Pals have enjoyed respect and security.
The
Chand, Gorkhas and the British rulers who occupied the area
from time to time had traditionally recognized the uniqueness
of the Pal family as an historically important clan. The Pals
have been traditionally awarded a very respectable status
and exclusivity by all the conquerors of the region. They
are the descendants of the Katyuri royal family.
The
importance of the Askote state and its Pal rulers did not
come from power or wealth. When Abhay Pal migrated to the
area in 1279 A.D., it was mostly a forest with a probable
population of a few hundred individuals. In 1881 A.D., 600
years later, the total population of this state was only 5879.
The
lifestyle during those days was altogether different. Earlier
land revenue used to be collected only in kind, which was
a third of the farmers' total produce. It was called "Sirti"
and the farmer was termed "Sirtan." The subjects
were required, in addition, to provide free food and transport
to the Rajwas and his entourage, while he toured his state.
Petty fines imposed on the offenders were also a source of
income. There were very few crimes or litigations hence revenues
from the judiciary sector were meagre.
The
Rajwars usually had several wives, plus servants, maids, followers,
sycophants and hangers-on. Resources were supplemented by
cultivating personal farms and animal stock. Thus the life
of the Pal family in the middle ages was simple and pristine.
There was, presumably, no outside impact or interference until
the later part of the 16th century.
In
1681, an officer of the Raja of Almora subjugated the adjacent
rulers of this part of India, including Askote state. During
the last decades of the 18th century the Gorkha rulers of
Nepal invaded their western neighbours of India and subjugated
the rulers of the hill states up to Kangra (now in Hamanchal
Pradesh). They did not interfere with Askote state except
that they increased the royalty from Rupees 400 previously
fixed by Chand Rajas, to Rupees 2000.
During
1814-1815, a war broke out between the British rulers of India
and the Nepalese Gurkha rulers, which led to several pitched
battles fought between the hills of Kumaon and Garhwal. The
Gurkhas were finally defeated and forced to give up all the
area west of the Kali River, which runs adjacent to Askote.
In accordance with the Sighauli treaty of 1816 all of that
area, including Askote, became part of the British Empire.
When India attained independence, Askote became part of independent
India.
REMNANTS
OF OLD CULTURE
Despite
all the difficult times, hardships and massacre of the family,
this branch of the Katyuri dynasty managed until the mid-20th
century to maintain the sanctity and serenity of its religion,
ancient manners, rituals and traditions of its royal descent.
All
religious dictates were scrupulously followed and observed.
Boys and girls were taught from very early childhood to behave
properly and respectfully towards their parents and elders.
Special attention was given to cleanliness. No member of the
Pal family was allowed to eat or drink before a routine morning
bath and worship. Children had to wash their hands, feet and
faces prior to the meals. Adults had to take off their usual
attire and put on a clean dhoti (a cotton or silk cloth of
about three metres in length) before entering the kitchen,
where places were marked for each person to sit, without touching
each other. The food was cooked only by a high caste Brahmin,
who was supposed to be physically and spiritually very clean
and hygiene conscious. There were several other customs as
well, which made the members of the Pal family very distinct
from the ordinary people of the area.
FINAL
REMARKS
Rajwar
Pushkar Pal informed historian E.T. Atkinson in 1871 that
he was in the 221st generation from Uttanpad, the younger
son of Manu, who had written the well-known Hindu book, Manusmriti.
Rajwar Pushkar Pal received a very rudimentary education since
there were no facilities for higher education in the proximity
of Askote at that time. The genealogical table provided by
Pushkar Pal appears to have been prepared from remembrances
passed down from generation to generation. Systematic documentation
was not customary in those days. Momentous dates, key names
and events were committed to memory and subsequently passed
on to the younger members of the family to memorize and reciprocate.
Unfortunately, several discrepancies I=exist in the genealogical
table. For instance, Rajwar Pushkar Pal is indicated as the
104th generation from Shaliwahan Dev, the founder of Katyuri
dynasty. Abhay Pal Dev of the 49th generation is reported
to have migrated to the Askote region in 1279 A.D.
A
generation could be considered to last 25 years, considering
a relatively short life span of the heirs at that time. Thus,
between 1279 A.D. and 1882 A.D., about 600 years, there could
not have been more than 24 generations. If the serial numbers
shown in the genealogy are correct, there were 56 generations
during this 600-year period. On the other hand, Pushkar Pal
told Atkinson that he was the 221st generation from Uttanpad
and 104 from Shalivahan Dev to Pushkar Pal. Calculations based
on 25 years for each generation indicate that the time of
Uttanpad comes to be around 5500 years, and of Shalivahan
Dev to be about 2600 years from that of Pushkar Pal. If this
theory were correct, there would be only 48 generations within
2000 years, as against 56 generations within 600 years. I
procured a copy of the genealogical table from the present
Rajwar Tikendra Bahadur Pal.
This document bears no names of Rajas from the serial number
54th to the 80th generation. I believe that these missing
27 Rajas were prior to Abhay Pal and not after him.
It
is obvious that the genealogy before Abhay Pal is inaccurate.
This also explains why the Katyuri kings, who are inscribed
on the copper plates, are missing in the genealogy table.
This confirms the earlier conclusion that the genealogical
table seems to have been prepared from remembrances passed
on successively to the young ones by the elders. It is easy
to remember the number of generations but not quite precisely
hundreds of names of the forefathers.
Furthermore,
according to the Hindu religion every highborn male is required
to pay homage to his ancestors once a year I a ceremony called
"Shradha," which is at the death anniversary and
during a fixed period of a fortnight, every year. On this
occasion one has to remember the names of three deceased immediate
ancestors on the father and the mother's side, and make ritual
offerings. Thus it was not impossible to remember the number
of generations.
It
may be plausible that there were only 29 generations from
Abhay Pal to Pushkar Pal, 104 generations from Shalivahan
Dev and 221 from Uttanpad. Abhay Pal must have been in the
76th generation from Shalivahan Dev and not in the 49th generation.
A thorough research is needed in this area to authenticate
the exact dates and names that existed in the Uttarakhand
part of the Himalayas for several centuries.
The
name Pal does not indicate a particular dynasty. It is a surname
adopted by this branch of the Katyuri dynasty after its separation
from the main stream. Its members call themselves "Suryavanshi"
Kshatriya of Saunak Gotra (followers of the sage Saunak).
They worship all the deities of the Hindu pantheon especially
Shiva or Mahadev. It remains to be seen how long this clan
will retain and maintain its unique identity. The future depends
on the will and determination of the living members of the
Pal family.
|
Gajraj
Singh Pal
Nainital, India
1995
|
|
|
|
|
GENEALOGY
OF THE PAL FAMILY
(SINCE
THEIR MIGRATION FROM KATYUR IN 1279 A.D.)
|
|
Generation
from Shalivahan Dev
|
|
ABHAY
PAL
(76th generation from Shalivahan Dev)
|
76
|
37 |
| Nirbhay
Pal |
77
|
38 |
| Bharat
Pal |
78
|
39 |
| Bhairon
Pal |
79
|
40 |
| Bhu
Pal |
80
|
41 |
| Ratan
Pal |
81
|
42 |
| Shankha
Pal |
82
|
43 |
| Shyam
Pal |
83
|
44 |
| Sai
Pal |
84
|
45 |
| Surjan
Pal |
85
|
46 |
| Bhoj
Pal |
86
|
47 |
| Bharat
Pal |
87
|
48 |
| Stuti
Pal |
88
|
49 |
| Achhav
Pal |
89
|
50 |
| Trilook
Pal |
90
|
51 |
| Surya
Pal |
91
|
52 |
| Jagat
Pal |
92
|
53 |
| Praja
Pal |
93
|
54 |
| Rai
Pal |
94
|
55 |
| Mahendra
Pal |
95
|
56 |
| Jait
Pal |
96
|
57 |
| Birbal
Pal |
97
|
58 |
| Amar
Pal |
98
|
59 |
| Abhay
Pal |
99
|
60 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|